Not to be confused withA.J. Green (CB · 2020–present).

Also in other sports:nbaAJ Green (G · 2023–present).

A.J. Green ranks in the all-time elite tier for receivers — a career that places Green in the top 3% of all players at the position. The Knox value model assigns Green a career score of 80, reflecting sustained impact that most players at the position never approach.

WRARI#18ACT

A.J. Green

7× Pro BowlTop 3% all-time WRsFranchise Cornerstone📉 Fades · -11% playoffs 🌅 Early Bloomer · 2013Two-Way ProfileTeam Carrier · #597

Career Value · VORP

270 career value over replacement — #175 all-time of 4,649. 24.5/season above a replacement-level WR.

Career Profile

9 top-10 seasonstop-10 marks

Draft OutcomeValue ↑

Pick #4 (Rd 1) · CIN · 2011 · +18.6 vs expected KV-H

80actual

61.4 expected · Δ+18.6

💔+29.8 stolen VORP·1.21 szns lost

Fan Rating

Rate A.J. Green — All-Time

Tap a star to rate

Explore More

Similar Players

Raymond Berry

98% match

Alshon Jeffery

94% match

Bobby Mitchell

94% match

Charley Taylor

94% match

Tetairoa McMillan

94% match

Compare A.J. Green vs Player Report data error

Combined Season Grid

The full season-by-season grids, joined on one timeline. Every selected stat family stays visible at once—no tab hopping. Switch to Combined to fold the selected families into unified totals—yards from scrimmage, total TDs, touches.

4 grids split in one view

Season	Age	Team	G	GS	Receiving									Rushing								Defense													Snap Counts
Season	Age	Team	G	GS	Tgt	Rec	Yds	TD	Ctch%	Y/R	Y/Tgt	AirYd/T	1D	Att	Yds	TD	Y/A	TD%	1D	1D%	Fmb	Tkl	Solo	Ast	TFL	QBHits	Sk	Dis	Int	PD	FF	FR	TD	Sfty	Off	Off%	Def	Def%	ST	ST%
2011	23	CIN	15	—	115	65	1,057	7	56.5%	16.3	9.2	—	43	5	53	0	10.6	0.0	3	60.0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	CIN	16	—	164	97	1,350	11	59.1%	13.9	8.2	—	61	4	38	0	9.5	0.0	2	50.0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	CIN	16	—	178	98	1,426	11	55.1%	14.6	8.0	—	65	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1,056	93.0%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2014	26	CIN	12	—	116	69	1,041	6	59.5%	15.1	9.0	—	46	2	2	0	1.0	0.0	0	0.0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	649	75.9%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2015	27	CIN	16	—	132	86	1,297	10	65.2%	15.1	9.8	—	63	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	931	87.6%	—	0.0%	2	0.4%
2016	28	CIN	10	—	100	66	964	4	66.0%	14.6	9.6	—	41	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	555	81.1%	1	0.1%	—	0.0%
2017	29	CIN	16	—	143	75	1,078	8	52.4%	14.4	7.5	—	55	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	0	0	0	0	0.0	0.0	0	1	0	—	0	0	852	87.1%	2	0.2%	—	0.0%
2018	30	CIN	9	—	77	46	694	6	59.7%	15.1	9.0	—	37	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	458	79.1%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2020	32	CIN	16	—	104	47	523	2	45.2%	11.1	5.0	—	34	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	820	76.9%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2021	33	ARI	16	—	92	54	848	3	58.7%	15.7	9.2	—	37	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	888	80.6%	—	0.0%	2	0.6%
2022	34	ARI	13	—	47	24	236	2	51.1%	9.8	5.0	—	11	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	554	51.9%	—	0.0%	1	0.3%
Career		—	155	—	1,268	727	10,514	70	57.3%	14.5	8.3	—	493	11	93	0	8.5	0.0	5	45.5	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.0	0.0	0	1	0	—	0	0	6,763	79.5%	3	0.0%	5	0.2%