Kyle Rudolph ranks in the all-time elite tier for tight ends — a career that places Rudolph in the top 10% of all players at the position. The Knox value model assigns Rudolph a career score of 69, reflecting sustained impact that most players at the position never approach.
The full season-by-season grids, joined on one timeline. Every selected stat family stays visible at once—no tab hopping. Switch to Combined to fold the selected families into unified totals—yards from scrimmage, total TDs, touches.
| Season | Age | Team | G | GS | Receiving | Snap Counts | Advanced Receiving (2018+) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Ctch% | Y/R | Y/Tgt | AirYd/T | 1D | Off | Off% | Def | Def% | ST | ST% | ADOT | YBC/R | YAC/R | BrkTkl | Drops | Drop% | 1D | TgtRate | |||||
| 2011 | 21–22 | MIN | 14 | — | 39 | 26 | 249 | 3 | 66.7% | 9.6 | 6.4 | — | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 22–23 | MIN | 16 | — | 94 | 53 | 493 | 9 | 56.4% | 9.3 | 5.2 | — | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 23–24 | MIN | 8 | — | 46 | 30 | 313 | 3 | 65.2% | 10.4 | 6.8 | — | 12 | 424 | 85.1% | — | 0.0% | 21 | 8.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 24–25 | MIN | 7 | — | 34 | 24 | 231 | 2 | 70.6% | 9.6 | 6.8 | — | 13 | 434 | 80.2% | — | 0.0% | 1 | 0.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 25–26 | MIN | 16 | — | 73 | 49 | 495 | 5 | 67.1% | 10.1 | 6.8 | — | 25 | 845 | 83.0% | — | 0.0% | 80 | 18.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 26–27 | MIN | 16 | — | 132 | 83 | 840 | 7 | 62.9% | 10.1 | 6.4 | — | 50 | 970 | 92.1% | — | 0.0% | 65 | 15.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 27–28 | MIN | 16 | — | 81 | 57 | 532 | 8 | 70.4% | 9.3 | 6.6 | — | 32 | 922 | 82.4% | — | 0.0% | 50 | 11.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 28–29 | MIN | 16 | — | 82 | 64 | 634 | 4 | 78.0% | 9.9 | 7.7 | — | 32 | 925 | 88.3% | — | 0.0% | 72 | 15.4% | 6.4 | 6.1 | 3.8 | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 32 | 110.1 |
| 2019 | 29–30 | MIN | 15 | — | 48 | 39 | 367 | 6 | 81.3% | 9.4 | 7.6 | — | 24 | 793 | 76.6% | — | 0.0% | 73 | 17.4% | 6.4 | 4.5 | 4.9 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 24 | 138.1 |
| 2020 | 30–31 | MIN | 12 | — | 37 | 28 | 334 | 1 | 75.7% | 11.9 | 9.0 | — | 16 | 574 | 72.1% | — | 0.0% | 50 | 14.8% | 7.1 | 6.1 | 5.9 | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 16 | 111.8 |
| 2021 | 31–32 | NYG | 15 | — | 39 | 26 | 257 | 1 | 66.7% | 9.9 | 6.6 | — | 12 | 500 | 48.1% | — | 0.0% | 46 | 10.6% | 5.9 | 4.6 | 5.3 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 12 | 93.6 |
| 2022 | 32–33 | TB | 5 | — | 5 | 3 | 28 | 1 | 60.0% | 9.3 | 5.6 | — | 2 | 79 | 12.3% | — | 0.0% | 1 | 0.3% | 7.6 | 8.3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | 115.0 |
| Career | — | 156 | — | 710 | 482 | 4,773 | 50 | 67.9% | 9.9 | 6.7 | — | 266 | 6,466 | 73.9% | — | 0.0% | 459 | 12.3% | — | — | — | 5 | 1 | — | 86 | — | |
Career Value · VORP
172 career value over replacement — #504 all-time of 4,649. 14.3/season above a replacement-level TE.
Pick #43 (Rd 2) · MIN · 2011 · +19.6 vs expected KV-H
Fan Rating
Rate Kyle Rudolph — All-Time
Explore More
Similar Players
| Season | Age | Team | G | GS | Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Ctch% | Y/R | Y/Tgt | AirYd/T | 1D | VAL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 21–22 | MIN | 14 | — | 39 | 26 | 249 | 3 | 66.7% | 9.6 | 6.4 | — | 14 | 8.5 |
| 2012 | 22–23 | MIN | 16 | — | 94 | 53 | 493 | 9 | 56.4% | 9.3 | 5.2 | — | 34 | 14.9 |
| 2013 | 23–24 | MIN | 8 | 7* | 46 | 30 | 313 | 3 | 65.2% | 10.4 | 6.8 | — | 12 | 6.8 |
| 2014 | 24–25 | MIN | 7 | 7* | 34 | 24 | 231 | 2 | 70.6% | 9.6 | 6.8 | — | 13 | 5.9 |
| 2015 | 25–26 | MIN | 16 | 13* | 73 | 49 | 495 | 5 | 67.1% | 10.1 | 6.8 | — | 25 | 13 |
| 2016 | 26–27 | MIN | 16 | 15* | 132 | 83 | 840 | 7 | 62.9% | 10.1 | 6.4 | — | 50 | 19.9 |
| 2017 | 27–28 | MIN | 16 | 13* | 81 | 57 | 532 | 8 | 70.4% | 9.3 | 6.6 | — | 32 | 19 |
| 2018 | 28–29 | MIN | 16 | 14* | 82 | 64 | 634 | 4 | 78.0% | 9.9 | 7.7 | — | 32 | 15.9 |
| 2019 | 29–30 | MIN | 15 | 12* | 48 | 39 | 367 | 6 | 81.3% | 9.4 | 7.6 | — | 24 | 12.9 |
| 2020 | 30–31 | MIN | 12 | 9* | 37 | 28 | 334 | 1 | 75.7% | 11.9 | 9.0 | — | 16 | 6.4 |
| 2021 | 31–32 | NYG | 15 | 0* | 39 | 26 | 257 | 1 | 66.7% | 9.9 | 6.6 | — | 12 | 6.4 |
| 2022 | 32–33 | TB | 5 | 0* | 5 | 3 | 28 | 1 | 60.0% | 9.3 | 5.6 | — | 2 | 1.9 |
| Career | 156 | 90* | 710 | 482 | 4,773 | 50 | 67.9% | 9.9 | 6.7 | — | 266 | 131.5 |
* GS not available from free sources — SG* estimated from snap share (nflverse 2012+)
| Season | Age | Team | G | GS | Off | Off% | Def | Def% | ST | ST% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 23–24 | MIN | 8 | 7* | 424 | 85.1% | — | 0.0% | 21 | 8.0% |
| 2014 | 24–25 | MIN | 9 | 7* | 434 | 80.2% | — | 0.0% | 1 | 0.4% |
| 2015 | 25–26 | MIN | 16 | 13* | 845 | 83.0% | — | 0.0% | 80 | 18.3% |
| 2016 | 26–27 | MIN | 16 | 15* | 970 | 92.1% | — | 0.0% | 65 | 15.1% |
| 2017 | 27–28 | MIN | 16 | 13* | 922 | 82.4% | — | 0.0% | 50 | 11.1% |
| 2018 | 28–29 | MIN | 16 | 14* | 925 | 88.3% | — | 0.0% | 72 | 15.4% |
| 2019 | 29–30 | MIN | 16 | 12* | 793 | 76.6% | — | 0.0% | 73 | 17.4% |
| 2020 | 30–31 | MIN | 12 | 9* | 574 | 72.1% | — | 0.0% | 50 | 14.8% |
| 2021 | 31–32 | NYG | 16 | 0* | 500 | 48.1% | — | 0.0% | 46 | 10.6% |
| 2022 | 32–33 | TB | 9 | 0* | 79 | 12.3% | — | 0.0% | 1 | 0.3% |
| Career | 134 | 90* | 6,466 | — | — | — | 459 | — |
* GS not available from free sources — SG* estimated from snap share (nflverse 2012+)
| Season | Age | Team | G | GS | ADOT | YBC/R | YAC/R | BrkTkl | Drops | Drop% | 1D | TgtRate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 28–29 | MIN | 16 | 14* | 6.4 | 6.1 | 3.8 | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 32 | 110.1 |
| 2019 | 29–30 | MIN | 16 | 12* | 6.4 | 4.5 | 4.9 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 24 | 138.1 |
| 2020 | 30–31 | MIN | 12 | 9* | 7.1 | 6.1 | 5.9 | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 16 | 111.8 |
| 2021 | 31–32 | NYG | 16 | 0* | 5.9 | 4.6 | 5.3 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 12 | 93.6 |
| 2022 | 32–33 | TB | 9 | 0* | 7.6 | 8.3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | 115.0 |
| Career | 69 | 35* | — | — | — | 5 | 1 | — | 86 | — |
* GS not available from free sources — SG* estimated from snap share (nflverse 2012+)
A strong starter career by KV-H: a peak-driven profile that scores 69 of 100, era-normalized against rec yds/g peers across 12 scored seasons.
Blend 66.8 × longevity 1 = KV-H 69· confidence 96%
Season-by-season quality (era-relative rec yds/g)
Martellus Bennett
TE
89% match
2011 Draft ClassmatesFull class →