Marco Battaglia is a career quality starter — a tight end whose body of work places Battaglia in the top half of all players at the position historically. The Knox model values sustained contribution over flash, and Battaglia's career arc reflects exactly that kind of reliable professional-grade performance.
The full season-by-season grids, joined on one timeline. Every selected stat family stays visible at once—no tab hopping. Switch to Combined to fold the selected families into unified totals—yards from scrimmage, total TDs, touches.
| Season | Age | Team | G | GS | Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Ctch% | Y/R | Y/Tgt | AirYd/T | 1D | |||||
| 1996 | 23–24 | CIN | 16 | — | — | 8 | 79 | 0 | — | 9.9 | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 24–25 | CIN | 16 | — | — | 12 | 149 | 1 | — | 12.4 | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 25–26 | CIN | 16 | — | — | 10 | 47 | 1 | — | 4.7 | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 26–27 | CIN | 11 | — | 27 | 14 | 153 | 0 | 51.9% | 10.9 | 5.7 | — | 6 |
| 2000 | 27–28 | CIN | 14 | — | 36 | 13 | 105 | 0 | 36.1% | 8.1 | 2.9 | — | 3 |
| 2001 | 28–29 | TOT | 7 | — | 24 | 14 | 127 | 0 | 58.3% | 9.1 | 5.3 | — | 8 |
| 2001 | 28–29 | CIN | 6 | — | 23 | 13 | 118 | 0 | 56.5% | 9.1 | 5.1 | — | 7 |
| 2001 | 28–29 | WAS | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 100.0% | 9.0 | 9.0 | — | 1 |
| 2002 | 29–30 | TB | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | — | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Career | — | 88 | — | 88 | 71 | 660 | 2 | 80.7% | 9.3 | 7.5 | — | 17 | |
Career Value · VORP
32 career value over replacement — #2595 all-time of 4,649. 5.3/season above a replacement-level TE.
Pick #39 (Rd 2) · CIN · 1996 · +2.5 vs expected KV-H
Fan Rating
Rate Marco Battaglia — All-Time
Explore More
Similar Players
| Season | Age | Team | G | GS | Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Ctch% | Y/R | Y/Tgt | AirYd/T | 1D | VAL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 23–24 | CIN | 16 | — | — | 8 | 79 | 0 | — | 9.9 | — | — | — | 7.4 |
| 1997 | 24–25 | CIN | 16 | — | — | 12 | 149 | 1 | — | 12.4 | — | — | — | 8.5 |
| 1998 | 25–26 | CIN | 16 | — | — | 10 | 47 | 1 | — | 4.7 | — | — | — | 6.9 |
| 1999 | 26–27 | CIN | 11 | — | 27 | 14 | 153 | 0 | 51.9% | 10.9 | 5.7 | — | 6 | 4.6 |
| 2000 | 27–28 | CIN | 14 | — | 36 | 13 | 105 | 0 | 36.1% | 8.1 | 2.9 | — | 3 | 3.2 |
| 2001 | 28–29 | TOT | 7 | — | 24 | 14 | 127 | 0 | 58.3% | 9.1 | 5.3 | — | 8 | 3.2 |
| 2001 | 28–29 | CIN | 6 | — | 23 | 13 | 118 | 0 | 56.5% | 9.1 | 5.1 | — | 7 | 3.2 |
| 2001 | 28–29 | WAS | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 100.0% | 9.0 | 9.0 | — | 1 | 3.2 |
| 2002 | 29–30 | TB | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | — | 0.0 | — | 0 | — |
| Career | 81 | 88 | 71 | 660 | 2 | 80.7% | 9.3 | 7.5 | — | 17 | 33.8 |
A solid career by KV-H: a remarkably steady profile that scores 53 of 100, era-normalized against rec yds/g peers across 6 scored seasons.
Blend 52.8 × longevity 1 = KV-H 53· confidence 98%
Season-by-season quality (era-relative rec yds/g)
Chad Fann
TE
89% match
1996 Draft ClassmatesFull class →