Not to be confused withMark Ingram (WR · 1987–1996).

Mark Ingram ranks in the all-time elite tier for running backs — a career that places Ingram in the top 10% of all players at the position. The Knox value model assigns Ingram a career score of 73, reflecting sustained impact that most players at the position never approach.

RBNO#5RES

Mark Ingram

3× Pro BowlTop 7% all-time RBsElite Playmaker

Height5'9"

Weight215 lb

BornDec 21, 1989

Age36

CollegeAlabama

Combined Season Grid

The full season-by-season grids, joined on one timeline. Every selected stat family stays visible at once—no tab hopping. Switch to Combined to fold the selected families into unified totals—yards from scrimmage, total TDs, touches.

4 grids split in one view

Season	Age	Team	G	GS	Rushing								Receiving									Defense													Snap Counts
Season	Age	Team	G	GS	Att	Yds	TD	Y/A	TD%	1D	1D%	Fmb	Tgt	Rec	Yds	TD	Ctch%	Y/R	Y/Tgt	AirYd/T	1D	Tkl	Solo	Ast	TFL	QBHits	Sk	Dis	Int	PD	FF	FR	TD	Sfty	Off	Off%	Def	Def%	ST	ST%
2011	21–22	NO	10	—	123	478	5	3.9	4.1	30	24.4	1	13	11	46	0	84.6%	4.2	3.5	—	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	22–23	NO	16	—	156	602	5	3.9	3.2	28	17.9	0	10	6	29	0	60.0%	4.8	2.9	—	2	0	0	0	0	0	0.0	0.0	0	0	0	—	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23–24	NO	11	—	78	386	1	4.9	1.3	18	23.1	0	11	7	68	0	63.6%	9.7	6.2	—	2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	169	21.9%	—	0.0%	7	2.5%
2014	24–25	NO	13	—	226	964	9	4.3	4.0	47	20.8	0	36	29	145	0	80.6%	5.0	4.0	—	5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	470	51.8%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2015	25–26	NO	12	—	166	769	6	4.6	3.6	44	26.5	0	60	50	405	0	83.3%	8.1	6.8	—	22	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	534	62.8%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2016	26–27	NO	16	—	205	1,043	6	5.1	2.9	49	23.9	2	58	46	319	4	79.3%	6.9	5.5	—	18	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	532	46.1%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2017	27–28	NO	16	—	230	1,124	12	4.9	5.2	50	21.7	2	71	58	416	0	81.7%	7.2	5.9	—	19	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	569	55.1%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2018	28–29	NO	12	—	138	645	6	4.7	4.3	34	24.6	1	27	21	170	1	77.8%	8.1	6.3	—	5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	350	45.0%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2019	29–30	BAL	15	—	202	1,018	10	5.0	5.0	53	26.2	2	29	26	247	5	89.7%	9.5	8.5	—	16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	503	48.5%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2020	30–31	BAL	10	—	72	299	2	4.2	2.8	14	19.4	0	8	6	50	0	75.0%	8.3	6.3	—	2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	160	23.4%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2021	31–32	TOT	14	—	160	554	2	3.5	1.3	22	13.8	1	35	27	162	0	77.1%	6.0	4.6	—	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	400	—	—	—	—	—
2021	31–32	HOU	7	—	92	294	1	3.2	1.1	13	14.1	0	9	7	24	0	77.8%	3.4	2.7	—	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	164	37.0%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2021	31–32	NO	7	—	68	260	1	3.8	1.5	9	13.2	1	26	20	138	0	76.9%	6.9	5.3	—	8	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	236	51.1%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2022	32–33	NO	10	—	62	233	1	3.8	1.6	12	19.4	1	18	16	68	0	88.9%	4.3	3.8	—	2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	205	31.4%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
Career		—	169	—	1,818	8,115	65	4.5	3.6	401	22.1	10	376	303	2,125	10	80.6%	7.0	5.7	—	105	0	0	0	0	0	0.0	0.0	0	0	0	—	0	0	3,892	44.2%	—	0.0%	7	0.2%

Career Value · VORP

178 career value over replacement — #474 all-time of 4,649. 14.8/season above a replacement-level RB.

Career Profile

4 top-10 seasonstop-10 marks 2-phase playertwo-way

Draft OutcomeValue ↑

Pick #28 (Rd 1) · NO · 2011 · +18.2 vs expected KV-H

73actual

54.8 expected · Δ+18.2

Fan Rating

Rate Mark Ingram — All-Time

Tap a star to rate

Explore More

Similar Players

James Robinson

95% match

John Henry Johnson

95% match

Ahmad Bradshaw

94% match

DeAngelo Williams

93% match

Jim Taylor

93% match

Compare Mark Ingram vs Player Report data error

ConferenceSoutheastern

Rushing

Season	Age	Team	G	GS	Att	Yds	TD	Y/A	TD%	1D	1D%	Fmb
2011	21–22	NO	10	—	123	478	5	3.9	4.1	30	24.4	1
2012	22–23	NO	16	—	156	602	5	3.9	3.2	28	17.9	0
2013	23–24	NO	11	0*	78	386	1	4.9	1.3	18	23.1	0
2014	24–25	NO	13	7*	226	964	9	4.3	4.0	47	20.8	0
2015	25–26	NO	12	8*	166	769	6	4.6	3.6	44	26.5	0
2016	26–27	NO	16	0*	205	1,043	6	5.1	2.9	49	23.9	2
2017	27–28	NO	16	9*	230	1,124	12	4.9	5.2	50	21.7	2
2018	28–29	NO	12	0*	138	645	6	4.7	4.3	34	24.6	1
2019	29–30	BAL	15	0*	202	1,018	10	5.0	5.0	53	26.2	2
2020	30–31	BAL	10	0*	72	299	2	4.2	2.8	14	19.4	0
2021	31–32	TOT	14	—	160	554	2	3.5	1.3	22	13.8	1
2021	31–32	HOU	7	—	92	294	1	3.2	1.1	13	14.1	0
2021	31–32	NO	7	—	68	260	1	3.8	1.5	9	13.2	1
2022	32–33	NO	10	0*	62	233	1	3.8	1.6	12	19.4	1
Career			155	24*	1,818	8,115	65	4.5	—	401	—	10

* GS not available from free sources — SG* estimated from snap share (nflverse 2012+)

Receiving

Season	Age	Team	G	GS	Tgt	Rec	Yds	TD	Ctch%	Y/R	Y/Tgt	AirYd/T	1D
2011	21–22	NO	10	—	13	11	46	0	84.6%	4.2	3.5	—	3
2012	22–23	NO	16	—	10	6	29	0	60.0%	4.8	2.9	—	2
2013	23–24	NO	11	0*	11	7	68	0	63.6%	9.7	6.2	—	2
2014	24–25	NO	13	7*	36	29	145	0	80.6%	5.0	4.0	—	5
2015	25–26	NO	12	8*	60	50	405	0	83.3%	8.1	6.8	—	22
2016	26–27	NO	16	0*	58	46	319	4	79.3%	6.9	5.5	—	18
2017	27–28	NO	16	9*	71	58	416	0	81.7%	7.2	5.9	—	19
2018	28–29	NO	12	0*	27	21	170	1	77.8%	8.1	6.3	—	5
2019	29–30	BAL	15	0*	29	26	247	5	89.7%	9.5	8.5	—	16
2020	30–31	BAL	10	0*	8	6	50	0	75.0%	8.3	6.3	—	2
2021	31–32	TOT	14	—	35	27	162	0	77.1%	6.0	4.6	—	9
2021	31–32	HOU	7	—	9	7	24	0	77.8%	3.4	2.7	—	1
2021	31–32	NO	7	—	26	20	138	0	76.9%	6.9	5.3	—	8
2022	32–33	NO	10	0*	18	16	68	0	88.9%	4.3	3.8	—	2
Career			155	24*	376	303	2,125	10	80.6%	7.0	5.7	—	105

* GS not available from free sources — SG* estimated from snap share (nflverse 2012+)

Snap Counts

Season	Age	Team	G	GS	Off	Off%	Def	Def%	ST	ST%
2013	23–24	NO	11	0*	169	21.9%	—	0.0%	7	2.5%
2014	24–25	NO	13	7*	470	51.8%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2015	25–26	NO	12	8*	534	62.8%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2016	26–27	NO	16	0*	532	46.1%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2017	27–28	NO	16	9*	569	55.1%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2018	28–29	NO	12	0*	350	45.0%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2019	29–30	BAL	15	0*	503	48.5%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2020	30–31	BAL	11	0*	160	23.4%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2021	31–32	TOT	14	—	400	—	—	—	—	—
2021	31–32	HOU	7	—	164	37.0%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2021	31–32	NO	7	—	236	51.1%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2022	32–33	NO	10	0*	205	31.4%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
Career			130	24*	3,892	—	—	—	7	—

* GS not available from free sources — SG* estimated from snap share (nflverse 2012+)

Advanced Rushing (2018+)

Season	Age	Team	G	GS	YBC	YBC/Att	YAC	YAC/Att	BrkTkl	Att/Br	1D
2018	28–29	NO	12	0*	274	2.0	371	2.7	18	7.7	34
2019	29–30	BAL	15	0*	494	2.4	524	2.6	18	11.2	53
2020	30–31	BAL	11	0*	173	2.4	126	1.8	6	12.0	14
2021	31–32	TOT*	14	—	237	1.5	317	2.0	9	17.8	23
2022	32–33	NO	10	0*	139	2.2	94	1.5	4	15.5	12
Career			62		1,317	—	1,432	—	55	—	136

* GS not available from free sources — SG* estimated from snap share (nflverse 2012+)

* Advanced source publishes an all-team season aggregate only. Exact team stints and team-specific counting stats remain available in the primary season tables.

Advanced Receiving (2018+)

Season	Age	Team	G	GS	ADOT	YBC/R	YAC/R	BrkTkl	Drop%	1D	TgtRate
2018	28–29	NO	12	0*	0.3	0.7	7.4	1	0.0	5	89.8
2019	29–30	BAL	15	0*	1.5	1.0	8.5	2	0.0	16	141.7
2020	30–31	BAL	11	0*	1.5	0.2	8.2	1	0.0	2	90.6
2021	31–32	TOT*	14	—	0.0	-0.1	6.1	2	0.0	9	85.7
2022	32–33	NO	10	0*	-0.9	-0.6	4.9	1	0.0	2	82.4
Career			62		—	—	—	7	—	34	—

* GS not available from free sources — SG* estimated from snap share (nflverse 2012+)

* Advanced source publishes an all-team season aggregate only. Exact team stints and team-specific counting stats remain available in the primary season tables.

KV-H Anatomy

KV-H 73 · Great

A great career by KV-H: a peak-driven profile that scores 73 of 100, era-normalized against rush yds/g peers across 12 scored seasons.

Sustained

career value

×.6

Peak

best 3 seasons

×.4

×1

Longevity

career length

Blend 70 × longevity 1 = KV-H 73· confidence 100%

What builds the career mark of 66

On-field 49.5

Availability 16.5

On-field production Staying available

Season-by-season quality (era-relative rush yds/g)

2011bestavg 65elite 702022

Rush Yds career shape vs similar running backs

2011-2022

Peak-aligned view: center line is each player's best Rush Yds season; left/right show build-up, staying power, and decline. Comparison set uses same-position, overlapping-era comps when available.