Not to be confused withMike Williams (DB · 1975–1983), Mike Williams (FB · 1979–1981), Mike Williams (TE · 1982–1984), Mike Williams (WR · 1989–1995), Mike Williams (DB · 1995), Mike Williams (G · 2002–2010), Mike Williams (WR · 2005–2011) or Mike Williams (WR · 2010–2014).

Also in other sports:mlbMike Williams (P · 1992–2003), nbaMike Williams.

Mike Williams is a career quality starter — a receiver whose body of work places Williams in the top quarter of all players at the position historically. The Knox model values sustained contribution over flash, and Williams's career arc reflects exactly that kind of reliable professional-grade performance.

WRNYJ#81NWT

Mike Williams

Top 11% all-time WRsElite Playmaker🏆 Clutch · +19% playoffsTwo-Way Profile

Height6'4"

Weight218 lb

Born

Career Value · VORP

109 career value over replacement — #997 all-time of 4,649. 15.6/season above a replacement-level WR.

Career Profile

1 top-10 seasonstop-10 marks

Draft OutcomeValue ↑

Pick #7 (Rd 1) · LAC · 2017 · +6.6 vs expected KV-H

68actual

61.4 expected · Δ+6.6

Fan Rating

Rate Mike Williams — All-Time

Tap a star to rate

Explore More

Similar Players

Hart Lee Dykes

95% match

Tyrell Williams

95% match

Malcom Floyd

94% match

Kenny Golladay

93% match

Martavis Bryant

93% match

Compare Mike Williams vs Player Report data error

Combined Season Grid

The full season-by-season grids, joined on one timeline. Every selected stat family stays visible at once—no tab hopping. Switch to Combined to fold the selected families into unified totals—yards from scrimmage, total TDs, touches.

4 grids split in one view

Season	Age	Team	G	GS	Receiving									Rushing								Defense													Snap Counts
Season	Age	Team	G	GS	Tgt	Rec	Yds	TD	Ctch%	Y/R	Y/Tgt	AirYd/T	1D	Att	Yds	TD	Y/A	TD%	1D	1D%	Fmb	Tkl	Solo	Ast	TFL	QBHits	Sk	Dis	Int	PD	FF	FR	TD	Sfty	Off	Off%	Def	Def%	ST	ST%
2017	22–23	LAC	9	—	23	11	95	0	47.8%	8.6	4.1	—	7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	235	34.7%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2018	23–24	LAC	16	—	66	43	664	10	65.2%	15.4	10.1	—	36	7	28	1	4.0	14.3	2	28.6	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	622	61.7%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2019	24–25	LAC	15	—	90	49	1,001	2	54.4%	20.4	11.1	—	41	1	2	0	2.0	0.0	0	0.0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	839	84.9%	—	0.0%	2	0.5%
2020	25–26	LAC	14	—	85	48	756	5	56.5%	15.8	8.9	—	35	1	1	0	1.0	0.0	0	0.0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.0	0.0	1	1	0	—	0	0	799	70.5%	1	0.1%	—	0.0%
2021	26–27	LAC	16	—	129	76	1,146	9	58.9%	15.1	8.9	—	51	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	896	78.9%	—	0.0%	3	0.7%
2022	27–28	LAC	13	—	93	63	895	4	67.7%	14.2	9.6	—	39	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	703	75.5%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2023	28–29	LAC	3	—	26	19	249	1	73.1%	13.1	9.6	—	9	1	3	0	3.0	0.0	0	0.0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	167	78.0%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2024	29–30	TOT	13	—	34	21	298	1	61.8%	14.2	8.8	—	14	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	472	—	—	—	—	—
2024	29–30	NYJ	7	—	21	12	166	0	57.1%	13.8	7.9	—	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	301	52.2%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2024	29–30	PIT	6	—	13	9	132	1	69.2%	14.7	10.2	—	5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	171	29.1%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
Career		—	112	—	546	330	5,104	32	60.4%	15.5	9.3	—	232	10	34	1	3.4	10.0	2	20.0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.0	0.0	1	1	0	—	0	0	4,733	64.9%	1	0.0%	5	0.2%