Nate Burleson is a career quality starter — a receiver whose body of work places Burleson in the top quarter of all players at the position historically. The Knox model values sustained contribution over flash, and Burleson's career arc reflects exactly that kind of reliable professional-grade performance.
The full season-by-season grids, joined on one timeline. Every selected stat family stays visible at once—no tab hopping. Switch to Combined to fold the selected families into unified totals—yards from scrimmage, total TDs, touches.
| Season | Age | Team | G | GS | Receiving | Rushing | Defense | Snap Counts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Ctch% | Y/R | Y/Tgt | AirYd/T | 1D | Att | Yds | TD | Y/A | TD% | 1D | 1D% | Fmb | Tkl | Solo | Ast | TFL | QBHits | Sk | Dis | Int | PD | FF | FR | TD | Sfty | Off | Off% | Def | Def% | ST | ST% | |||||
| 2003 | 22 | MIN | 13 | — | 29 | 29 | 455 | 2 | 100.0% | 15.7 | 15.7 | — | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 23 | MIN | 16 | — | 68 | 68 | 1,006 | 9 | 100.0% | 14.8 | 14.8 | — | 50 | 6 | 49 | 0 | 8.2 | 0.0 | 4 | 66.7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 24 | MIN | 11 | — | 30 | 30 | 328 | 1 | 100.0% | 10.9 | 10.9 | — | 20 | 2 | -6 | 0 | -3.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 25 | SEA | 12 | — | 18 | 18 | 192 | 2 | 100.0% | 10.7 | 10.7 | — | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 26 | SEA | 16 | — | 50 | 50 | 694 | 9 | 100.0% | 13.9 | 13.9 | — | 37 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 27 | SEA | 1 | — | 5 | 5 | 60 | 1 | 100.0% | 12.0 | 12.0 | — | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 28 | SEA | 13 | — | 103 | 63 | 812 | 3 | 61.2% | 12.9 | 7.9 | — | 42 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 29 | DET | 14 | — | 86 | 55 | 625 | 6 | 64.0% | 11.4 | 7.3 | — | 32 | 7 | 81 | 0 | 11.6 | 0.0 | 5 | 71.4 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 30 | DET | 16 | — | 112 | 74 | 771 | 3 | 66.1% | 10.4 | 6.9 | — | 37 | 11 | 85 | 0 | 7.7 | 0.0 | 6 | 54.5 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 31 | DET | 6 | — | 43 | 27 | 240 | 2 | 62.8% | 8.9 | 5.6 | — | 14 | 8 | 48 | 0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 2 | 25.0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 32 | DET | 9 | — | 54 | 39 | 461 | 1 | 72.2% | 11.8 | 8.5 | — | 23 | 2 | -8 | 0 | -4.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 502 | 80.0% | — | 0.0% | 1 | 0.3% |
| Career | — | 127 | — | 598 | 458 | 5,644 | 39 | 76.6% | 12.3 | 9.4 | — | 285 | 40 | 257 | 0 | 6.4 | 0.0 | 17 | 42.5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 502 | 80.0% | — | 0.0% | 1 | 0.3% | |
Career Value · VORP
100 career value over replacement — #1120 all-time of 4,649. 10/season above a replacement-level WR.
Pick #71 (Rd 3) · MIN · 2003 · +19.1 vs expected KV-H
Fan Rating
Rate Nate Burleson — All-Time
Explore More
Similar Players
| Season | Age | Team | G | GS | Att | Yds | TD | Y/A | TD% | 1D | 1D% | Fmb | VAL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 23 | MIN | 16 | — | 6 | 49 | 0 | 8.2 | 0.0 | 4 | 66.7 | 0 | 15.6 |
| 2005 | 24 | MIN | 11 | — | 2 | -6 | 0 | -3.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 4.4 |
| 2007 | 26 | SEA | 16 | — | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 13.4 |
| 2009 | 28 | SEA | 13 | — | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 10.8 |
| 2010 | 29 | DET | 14 | — | 7 | 81 | 0 | 11.6 | 0.0 | 5 | 71.4 | 0 | 11.2 |
| 2011 | 30 | DET | 16 | — | 11 | 85 | 0 | 7.7 | 0.0 | 6 | 54.5 | 0 | 11.6 |
| 2012 | 31 | DET | 6 | — | 8 | 48 | 0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 2 | 25.0 | 0 | 4.5 |
| 2013 | 32 | DET | 9 | 7* | 2 | -8 | 0 | -4.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 5.7 |
| Career | 101 | 7* | 40 | 257 | 0 | 6.4 | — | 17 | — | 0 | 86.3 |
* GS not available from free sources — SG* estimated from snap share (nflverse 2012+)
| Season | Age | Team | G | GS | Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Ctch% | Y/R | Y/Tgt | AirYd/T | 1D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 22 | MIN | 13 | — | 29 | 29 | 455 | 2 | 100.0% | 15.7 | 15.7 | — | 17 |
| 2004 | 23 | MIN | 16 | — | 68 | 68 | 1,006 | 9 | 100.0% | 14.8 | 14.8 | — | 50 |
| 2005 | 24 | MIN | 11 | — | 30 | 30 | 328 | 1 | 100.0% | 10.9 | 10.9 | — | 20 |
| 2006 | 25 | SEA | 12 | — | 18 | 18 | 192 | 2 | 100.0% | 10.7 | 10.7 | — | 9 |
| 2007 | 26 | SEA | 16 | — | 50 | 50 | 694 | 9 | 100.0% | 13.9 | 13.9 | — | 37 |
| 2008 | 27 | SEA | 1 | — | 5 | 5 | 60 | 1 | 100.0% | 12.0 | 12.0 | — | 4 |
| 2009 | 28 | SEA | 13 | — | 103 | 63 | 812 | 3 | 61.2% | 12.9 | 7.9 | — | 42 |
| 2010 | 29 | DET | 14 | — | 86 | 55 | 625 | 6 | 64.0% | 11.4 | 7.3 | — | 32 |
| 2011 | 30 | DET | 16 | — | 112 | 74 | 771 | 3 | 66.1% | 10.4 | 6.9 | — | 37 |
| 2012 | 31 | DET | 6 | — | 43 | 27 | 240 | 2 | 62.8% | 8.9 | 5.6 | — | 14 |
| 2013 | 32 | DET | 9 | 7* | 54 | 39 | 461 | 1 | 72.2% | 11.8 | 8.5 | — | 23 |
| Career | 127 | 7* | 598 | 458 | 5,644 | 39 | 76.6% | 12.3 | 9.4 | — | 285 |
* GS not available from free sources — SG* estimated from snap share (nflverse 2012+)
* GS not available from free sources — SG* estimated from snap share (nflverse 2012+)
A strong starter career by KV-H: a peak-driven profile that scores 62 of 100, era-normalized against rec yds/g peers across 10 scored seasons.
Blend 62 × longevity 1 = KV-H 62· confidence 98%
Season-by-season quality (era-relative rec yds/g)
Ike Hilliard
WR
90% match
2003 Draft ClassmatesFull class →