Zach Ertz ranks in the all-time elite tier for tight ends — a career that places Ertz in the top 3% of all players at the position. The Knox value model assigns Ertz a career score of 87, reflecting sustained impact that most players at the position never approach.
The full season-by-season grids, joined on one timeline. Every selected stat family stays visible at once—no tab hopping. Switch to Combined to fold the selected families into unified totals—yards from scrimmage, total TDs, touches.
| Season | Age | Team | G | GS | Receiving | Rushing | Defense | Snap Counts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Ctch% | Y/R | Y/Tgt | AirYd/T | 1D | Att | Yds | TD | Y/A | TD% | 1D | 1D% | Fmb | Tkl | Solo | Ast | TFL | QBHits | Sk | Dis | Int | PD | FF | FR | TD | Sfty | Off | Off% | Def | Def% | ST | ST% | |||||
| 2013 | 22–23 | PHI | 15 | — | 56 | 36 | 469 | 4 | 64.3% | 13.0 | 8.4 | — | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 450 | 40.9% | — | 0.0% | 167 | 34.1% |
| 2014 | 23–24 | PHI | 16 | — | 89 | 58 | 702 | 3 | 65.2% | 12.1 | 7.9 | — | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 588 | 50.4% | — | 0.0% | 210 | 40.4% |
| 2015 | 24–25 | PHI | 15 | — | 112 | 75 | 853 | 2 | 67.0% | 11.4 | 7.6 | — | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 789 | 71.5% | — | 0.0% | 83 | 17.7% |
| 2016 | 25–26 | PHI | 14 | — | 106 | 78 | 816 | 4 | 73.6% | 10.5 | 7.7 | — | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 849 | 85.6% | — | 0.0% | 137 | 35.7% |
| 2017 | 26–27 | PHI | 14 | — | 110 | 74 | 824 | 8 | 67.3% | 11.1 | 7.5 | — | 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 776 | 79.5% | — | 0.0% | 83 | 20.9% |
| 2018 | 27–28 | PHI | 16 | — | 156 | 116 | 1,163 | 8 | 74.4% | 10.0 | 7.5 | — | 65 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,000 | 91.6% | — | 0.0% | 2 | 0.4% |
| 2019 | 28–29 | PHI | 15 | — | 135 | 88 | 916 | 6 | 65.2% | 10.4 | 6.8 | — | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 932 | 85.1% | — | 0.0% | 3 | 0.7% |
| 2020 | 29–30 | PHI | 11 | — | 72 | 36 | 335 | 1 | 50.0% | 9.3 | 4.7 | — | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 635 | 81.3% | — | 0.0% | 10 | 2.7% |
| 2021 | 30–31 | TOT | 17 | — | 112 | 74 | 763 | 5 | 66.1% | 10.3 | 6.8 | — | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 849 | — | — | — | 1 | — |
| 2021 | 30–31 | ARI | 11 | — | 81 | 56 | 574 | 3 | 69.1% | 10.3 | 7.1 | — | 30 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 618 | 80.8% | — | 0.0% | 1 | 0.4% |
| 2021 | 30–31 | PHI | 6 | — | 31 | 18 | 189 | 2 | 58.1% | 10.5 | 6.1 | — | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 231 | 62.0% | — | 0.0% | — | 0.0% |
| 2022 | 31–32 | ARI | 10 | — | 69 | 47 | 406 | 4 | 68.1% | 8.6 | 5.9 | — | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 575 | 78.6% | — | 0.0% | 3 | 1.0% |
| 2023 | 32–33 | ARI | 7 | — | 43 | 27 | 187 | 1 | 62.8% | 6.9 | 4.3 | — | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 295 | 64.9% | — | 0.0% | — | 0.0% |
| 2024 | 33–34 | WAS | 17 | — | 91 | 66 | 654 | 7 | 72.5% | 9.9 | 7.2 | — | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 771 | 66.9% | — | 0.0% | 2 | 0.5% |
| 2025 | 34–35 | WAS | 13 | — | 72 | 50 | 504 | 4 | 69.4% | 10.1 | 7.0 | — | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 551 | 66.5% | — | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% |
| Career | — | 197 | — | 1,223 | 825 | 8,592 | 57 | 67.5% | 10.4 | 7.0 | — | 460 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9,060 | 71.7% | — | 0.0% | 702 | 12.8% | |
Career Value · VORP
360 career value over replacement — #60 all-time of 4,649. 27.7/season above a replacement-level TE.
Career Profile
Pick #35 (Rd 2) · PHI · 2013 · +32.2 vs expected KV-H
Fan Rating
Rate Zach Ertz — All-Time
Explore More
Similar Players
| Season | Age | Team | G | GS | Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Ctch% | Y/R | Y/Tgt | AirYd/T | 1D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 22–23 | PHI | 15 | 0* | 56 | 36 | 469 | 4 | 64.3% | 13.0 | 8.4 | — | 25 |
| 2014 | 23–24 | PHI | 16 | 8* | 89 | 58 | 702 | 3 | 65.2% | 12.1 | 7.9 | — | 42 |
| 2015 | 24–25 | PHI | 15 | 11* | 112 | 75 | 853 | 2 | 67.0% | 11.4 | 7.6 | — | 39 |
| 2016 | 25–26 | PHI | 14 | 12* | 106 | 78 | 816 | 4 | 73.6% | 10.5 | 7.7 | — | 42 |
| 2017 | 26–27 | PHI | 14 | 11* | 110 | 74 | 824 | 8 | 67.3% | 11.1 | 7.5 | — | 46 |
| 2018 | 27–28 | PHI | 16 | 15* | 156 | 116 | 1,163 | 8 | 74.4% | 10.0 | 7.5 | — | 65 |
| 2019 | 28–29 | PHI | 15 | 13* | 135 | 88 | 916 | 6 | 65.2% | 10.4 | 6.8 | — | 50 |
| 2020 | 29–30 | PHI | 11 | 9* | 72 | 36 | 335 | 1 | 50.0% | 9.3 | 4.7 | — | 16 |
| 2021 | 30–31 | TOT | 17 | — | 112 | 74 | 763 | 5 | 66.1% | 10.3 | 6.8 | — | 40 |
| 2021 | 30–31 | ARI | 11 | — | 81 | 56 | 574 | 3 | 69.1% | 10.3 | 7.1 | — | 30 |
| 2021 | 30–31 | PHI | 6 | — | 31 | 18 | 189 | 2 | 58.1% | 10.5 | 6.1 | — | 10 |
| 2022 | 31–32 | ARI | 10 | 8* | 69 | 47 | 406 | 4 | 68.1% | 8.6 | 5.9 | — | 24 |
| 2023 | 32–33 | ARI | 7 | 5* | 43 | 27 | 187 | 1 | 62.8% | 6.9 | 4.3 | — | 8 |
| 2024 | 33–34 | WAS | 17 | 11* | 91 | 66 | 654 | 7 | 72.5% | 9.9 | 7.2 | — | 38 |
| 2025 | 34–35 | WAS | 13 | 9* | 72 | 50 | 504 | 4 | 69.4% | 10.1 | 7.0 | — | 25 |
| Career | 180 | 112* | 1,223 | 825 | 8,592 | 57 | 67.5% | 10.4 | 7.0 | — | 460 |
* GS not available from free sources — SG* estimated from snap share (nflverse 2012+)
| Season | Age | Team | G | GS | Tkl | Solo | Ast | TFL | QBHits | Sk | Dis | Int | PD | FF | FR | TD | Sfty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 23–24 | PHI | 1 | 1* | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 25–26 | PHI | 1 | 1* | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 34–35 | WAS | 1 | 1* | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| Career | 3 | 3* | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
* GS not available from free sources — SG* estimated from snap share (nflverse 2012+)
| Season | Age | Team | G | GS | Off | Off% | Def | Def% | ST | ST% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 22–23 | PHI | 16 | 0* | 450 | 40.9% | — | 0.0% | 167 | 34.1% |
| 2014 | 23–24 | PHI | 16 | 8* | 588 | 50.4% | — | 0.0% | 210 | 40.4% |
| 2015 | 24–25 | PHI | 15 | 11* | 789 | 71.5% | — | 0.0% | 83 | 17.7% |
| 2016 | 25–26 | PHI | 14 | 12* | 849 | 85.6% | — | 0.0% | 137 | 35.7% |
| 2017 | 26–27 | PHI | 14 | 11* | 776 | 79.5% | — | 0.0% | 83 | 20.9% |
| 2018 | 27–28 | PHI | 16 | 15* | 1,000 | 91.6% | — | 0.0% | 2 | 0.4% |
| 2019 | 28–29 | PHI | 15 | 13* | 932 | 85.1% | — | 0.0% | 3 | 0.7% |
| 2020 | 29–30 | PHI | 11 | 9* | 635 | 81.3% | — | 0.0% | 10 | 2.7% |
| 2021 | 30–31 | TOT | 17 | — | 849 | — | — | — | 1 | — |
| 2021 | 30–31 | ARI | 11 | — | 618 | 80.8% | — | 0.0% | 1 | 0.4% |
| 2021 | 30–31 | PHI | 6 | — | 231 | 62.0% | — | 0.0% | — | 0.0% |
| 2022 | 31–32 | ARI | 10 | 8* | 575 | 78.6% | — | 0.0% | 3 | 1.0% |
| 2023 | 32–33 | ARI | 7 | 5* | 295 | 64.9% | — | 0.0% | — | 0.0% |
| 2024 | 33–34 | WAS | 17 | 11* | 771 | 66.9% | — | 0.0% | 2 | 0.5% |
| 2025 | 34–35 | WAS | 13 | 9* | 551 | 66.5% | — | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% |
| Career | 181 | 112* | 9,060 | — | — | — | 702 | — |
* GS not available from free sources — SG* estimated from snap share (nflverse 2012+)
| Season | Age | Team | G | GS | YBC | YBC/Att | YAC | YAC/Att | BrkTkl | Att/Br | 1D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 30–31 | TOT* | 17 | — | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| Career | 17 | 4 | — | 0 | — | 0 | — | 0 |
* Advanced source publishes an all-team season aggregate only. Exact team stints and team-specific counting stats remain available in the primary season tables.
| Season | Age | Team | G | GS | ADOT | YBC/R | YAC/R | BrkTkl | Drops | Drop% | 1D | TgtRate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 27–28 | PHI | 16 | 15* | 7.2 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 3 | 5 | 0.0 | 66 | 98.9 |
| 2019 | 28–29 | PHI | 15 | 13* | 8.6 | 7.5 | 2.9 | 5 | 5 | 0.0 | 50 | 96.4 |
| 2020 | 29–30 | PHI | 11 | 9* | 7.4 | 6.9 | 2.4 | 0 | 5 | 0.1 | 16 | 50.4 |
| 2021 | 30–31 | TOT* | 17 | — | 7.6 | 5.7 | 4.6 | 2 | 6 | 0.1 | 40 | 85.5 |
| 2022 | 31–32 | ARI | 10 | 8* | 7.9 | 5.9 | 2.8 | 2 | 3 | 0.0 | 24 | 96.6 |
| 2023 | 32–33 | ARI | 7 | 5* | 7.7 | 5.2 | 1.7 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 8 | 60.9 |
| 2024 | 33–34 | WAS | 17 | 11* | 7.4 | 7.1 | 2.8 | 0 | 4 | 0.0 | 38 | 109.0 |
| 2025 | 34–35 | WAS | 13 | 9* | 9.0 | 7.6 | 2.5 | 1 | 5 | 0.1 | 25 | 96.1 |
| Career | 106 | 70* | — | — | — | 13 | 35 | — | 267 | — |
* GS not available from free sources — SG* estimated from snap share (nflverse 2012+)
* Advanced source publishes an all-team season aggregate only. Exact team stints and team-specific counting stats remain available in the primary season tables.
A all-time great career by KV-H: a peak-driven profile that scores 87 of 100, era-normalized against rec yds/g peers across 13 scored seasons.
Blend 82.4 × longevity 1 = KV-H 87· confidence 99%
Season-by-season quality (era-relative rec yds/g)
Tyler Warren
TE
90% match
2013 Draft ClassmatesFull class →
Famous Partnership
Fletcher Cox
9 shared seasons · combined KV-H 1337